#A7RII FLICKR GALLERY MANUAL#
#A7RII FLICKR GALLERY FULL#

Maybe f4 is a little slow, but if your eusing it for macro you are probably gonng to want to stop down anyway. Sharpness: 10 Aberrations: 10 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 9 Value: 9 Camera Used: K5, k5 iis Now I own the DFA 100 mm macro this one became redundant.

#A7RII FLICKR GALLERY FULL#

On full frame this is a nice portrait lens either. If you want a low budget versatile 100 mm this might be a good option. This very old optical formula seems to shine for bokeh and it delivers… Contrast stays a little bit behind its modern siblings, but is easely adjustable in post. Wide open a bit soft but stopped down very sharp.

#A7RII FLICKR GALLERY MANUAL#

Nice old school all manual 1:2 macro for a few bucks. Sharpness: 8 Aberrations: 9 Bokeh: 10 Handling: 10 Value: 10 Camera Used: K1ii, K-01 and film Look & feel, build quality, performance stopped down On a Sony mirrorless the punch-in magnification makes focusing a breeze. On a film camera such as ME Super or MX, the handling brings back those early memories that I still remember. For the important slides or negatives I use a small darkroom enlarger as the light source. The slide projector workflow is fast and yields good results, though the light source shows some vignetting. Being a macro lens it has a very flat field and is simple use connected to an inexpensive bellows unit. The 100mm focal length is perfect - as I can work some distance from the slide or 35mm negative. For digitising thousands of slides, similar to what Henrico has been doing in his post. Lately I've be rebuilding my original Pentax SLR system and added this lens (again) for a specific purpose. I think that it was one of the first telephoto lenses that I acquired at the time. I first purchased this 100mm Macro lens in my early 20s and always enjoyed the versatility. This is my first posting on this forum, so hope this is useful. Sharpness: 9 Aberrations: 9 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 9 Value: 9 Camera Used: Mostly Sony a7RII Handling, build quality, flat field sharpness. If someone already has this lens there is no point buying macro version because there is almost no difference.

Pentax M 100/2.8 (non macro) - comparable in contrast and resolution (using macro tubes) and even exceeds it from f5.6 on, and does not have problems with glass separation because it does not have glued elements. Vivitar Auto Macro 90/2.8 - goes 1:1 without adapters

Tamron SP 90/2.5 - better resolution and bokeh Minolta MD 100/4 - better colors, better contrast wide open It is hard to find good copy (without fungus or element separation). If someone wants to have it in its own collection - fine. Generally, lens is very good, as all macro lenses are in that era. Sharpness: 6 Aberrations: 9 Bokeh: 5 Handling: 8 Value: 5 Camera Used: Nikon Z5 This lens was also released with a dental scale as the smc PENTAX-M DENTAL MACRO 1:4 100mmį4 not so sharp, dull and washed colors in some situations, less contrast and resolution than M100/2.8 with macro tubes Lens hood PH-R49 fits, but isnt necessary du to the recessed front element This macro lens was also released with a dental scale.

A7rii flickr gallery